Paragraphs arise from the tomb.

Well, maybe the title is a bit overstated. But, it sure sounds dramatic enough.

There’s been a bit of a buzz about Other bloggers on The Books of the Bible.

A comment at
A breath of fresh air caught my eye. He or she said:

One of my frustrations with reference and study bibles is that the various notes and annotations can actually distract the reader and take focus away from the text – there is a time and place for study, but many times we just need to sit down and read and meditate on the Word of God.

In fact, consider how tuned the mind is to the various kinds of forms that flow on the page. There’s the paragraph, which The Books of the Bible emphasizes. There are sentences. There’s indentation for quotes, etc. However, they don’t emphasize the incredible sensitivity the mind has to the forms on the page. The thing that does is the tiny, little comma.

Have you ever noticed the difference between the comma and the period. It’s not much, is it? It’s a couple of pixels of linguistic real estate on a computer screen. And yet the mind notices it and generates a semantic pause, as it were–one intended by the author. How much more does all the…well…extra analytical stuff…cause the mind to stutter?

I’m not saying we should toss analysis; what the person above calls study. Analysis is vital to an accurate understanding. However, I strongly suggest that a level of comprehension that comes from thinking the paragraph level thoughts of the original author after him is at least as important. I think these two methods of understanding the text are married, and should never be divorced.

So, I agree with the quote above. In fact, I would go so far as to say a person really doesn’t understand the text until one can simply read it. Ironic, isn’t it, that a study Bible really doesn’t support this very well. How easy is it to read a paragraph in a study Bible and say, “Ahh, yes, of course, he’s saying, ‘Insert topic sentence here’?” Not easy! We aren’t trained to read our Bibles in terms of paragraphs.

We’re trained in another way of thinking. Here’s a posting about exegesis (Software tools for original language exegesis). Notice that the exegesis he describes is verse-based and not paragraph based. This method is all too common. And, frankly, not linguistically sound.

Somehow we have to reorient our thinking. Perhaps this Bible, The Books of the Bible, is a Better Bible. Perhaps, hopefully, it’s a gentle enough push in the right direction.

One thought on “Paragraphs arise from the tomb.

  1. InHim says:

    When I switched to NRSV as my main translation I bought a plain ol’ Bible. The Bible, just the Bible and nothing but the Bible, except for the footnotes.

    In study Bibles there is often more study stuff than Bible.

    If I want to study I do it online or read a good commentary that I’ve carefully selected.

    Now if they only had a plain version with the text all on one line like The Books of the Bible I’d be happy.

    I would miss the verse numbers though. If I were reading a commentary and using that Bible to look up references used, they would be difficult to locate.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s